Materialism is Performatively Impossible: The Universal Principle of Collapse (UPC)
Source (Inner Potential) ➔ The Observer (Consciousness) ➔ The Collapse (Judgement/Action) ➔ Reality (Fixed Coordinates)
I watched a video in which materialist were about to argue for materialism, and the collapse was so severe at inception, just by the suggestion that materialism is being argued for while using upstream source and consciousness, I stopped, and wrote the following:
I stopped watching at 6:31 to write.
What happened at the start is the beginning of what people can describe as dialog, exchange, debate, inquiry, conversation, and so on. This communication between the participants used a medium: language.
Language that was shared in common between those involved in the discussion. Meaning, they all shared that language tool, with a certain understanding of word definitions. This allowed them to exchange packets of ideas easier than if they were speaking different languages.
While the shared language obviously does not secure that the participants will agree, the language category should be distinguished from the word I included just previously: “ideas.”
Ideas are upstream from language, and consciousness is upstream from both language and ideas. Existence is upstream from all those just mentioned, because it is the first requirement for all else that follows.
In other words, regardless of materialism as a concept, there is simply the empirical and observable first before all else follows, to be, to exist. The state of being requires nothing downstream to justify it. Instead, it is being that decides according to the living’s judgement, according to their will as they see fit.
Language is a negotiation tool between the living. But language does not carry meaning in a way that can fully deliver the totality and depth of experience from one person to another. Instead, language is a summary and shortcut transmission, downstream from existence.
The materialist is skipping steps when they claim materialism. They are tapping into the upstream inner world of potential where ideas, concepts, emotions, and feelings exist in a certain state of constant superposition. They use this to stake their claim of materialism, while denying that inner world and judgement for others. This is paradox.
The moment they argue with a mind, they are, without their knowledge, likely, confessing error and collapse. In order to attempt to affirm their views, they need to tap into that same depth where all else is available. Be it art, imagination, faith, and more. It is just that in their case, they have judged and collapsed a determination. In doing so, they affirm what is upstream at inception.
Their argument would best be served by right away shutting themselves up and delivering materialism. Each communication they engage in counters their position.
Materialism is a judgement out of endless ideas that originate upstream, where those that have collapsed into that argument attempt to convince others that what is upstream is nonexistent in reality, while using the very same for their preferences.
Materialists use language to argue for materialism. But language is a human invention, human invention requires mind, mind requires consciousness, consciousness is not reducible to matter in any immediate way. Therefore, materialism depends on what it denies.
To argue for materialism, one must first borrow from the non‑material. Their preferences are based on meaning, meaning that occurs in the inner mind where all other options are available. Their best defense is to be mute and even still that would not rescue them from collapse at the inception of their claim. Because claim also collapses them as it too requires the inner world which is vast, observably. Their position is paradox.